Ow. Cass et al., Insertion, efficacy, and removal of a nonendoscopically removable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube, SURG ENDOSC, 13(5), 1999, pp. 516-519
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Background: Externally removable PEG tubes require an internal bumper that
can collapse to a size that is small enough to allow for its removal throug
h the abdominal wall by external traction. Adequate force must be maintaine
d to avoid accidental dislodgement of the tube prior to its desired removal
.
Methods: A nonendoscopically removable PEG (Inverta-PEG, Ross Products Divi
sion, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH, USA) was evaluated in a nonmasked,
prospective clinical study involving 131 patients enrolled by 25 physician
s. The over-the-wire (Sacks-Vine) technique was used for all placements. Af
ter insertion, patients were followed weekly for 8 weeks. During week 9, th
e PEGs were removed percutaneously (nonendoscopically), Insertion, efficacy
, and removal performance were evaluated.
Results: Complication rate during insertion was 1.5% and removal was 1.2%.
Qualitatively, investigators rated ease of insertion and removal as very ea
sy, easy, average, difficult, or very difficult. Investigators rated. 98.5%
of insertions as very easy, easy, or average; 95.4% of removals were rated
as very easy, easy, or average. Some patients exited the study prematurely
due to leakage around the stoma (2.3%) and inadvertent tube removal (5.3%)
. These complication rates were consistent with earlier reports of other PE
G studies.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate that Inverta-PEG is a safe and effec
tive tube that can be removed nonendoscopically with ease in 95% of the cas
es.