Engagement in a non-escape (displacement) behavior elicits a selective andlateralized suppression of frontal cortical dopaminergic utilization in stress
Cw. Berridge et al., Engagement in a non-escape (displacement) behavior elicits a selective andlateralized suppression of frontal cortical dopaminergic utilization in stress, SYNAPSE, 32(3), 1999, pp. 187-197
Although the preferential activation of the prefrontal cortical (PFC) dopam
inergic system is generally observed in stress, limited exceptions to this
have been observed. Certain non-escape behaviors have been demonstrated to
attenuate physiological indices of stress (e.g., coping or displacement res
ponses). One well-characterized non-escape behavior observed in stress is c
hewing, or gnawing, of inedible objects. Engagement in this behavior attenu
ates stress-related activation of the hypothalamopituitary-adrenal axis, in
a variety of species. We examined the degree to which engagement in this n
on-escape behavior modulates stressor-induced activation of the PFC dopamin
e (DA) system. Rats and mice were exposed to a brightly lit novel environme
nt (novelty stress) in the presence or absence of inedible objects. Followi
ng novelty exposure, various dopaminergic terminal fields were collected an
d dopamine and its major catabolite, DOPAC, were measured using HPLC with e
lectrochemical detection. DOPAC/DA ratios were calculated as an index of DA
utilization. In some cases serotonin (5-HT) and its major catabolite, 5-HI
AA, were also measured. In animals that did not chew, novelty exposure elic
ited significant increases in DOPAC/DA levels within PFC, nucleus accumbens
(shell and core subdivisions), and striatum (relative to quiet-controls).
DOPAC/DA responses were greater in the right PFC than in the left PFC. Anim
als that chewed displayed significantly lower DOPAC/DA responses in PFC, bu
t not other dopaminergic terminal fields. This effect of chewing was always
observed in the right PFC and less consistently in the left PFC. Chewing d
id not alter novelty-induced increases in PFC 5-HIAA/5-HT responses. Thus,
engagement in this non-escape behavior elicits a neuroanatomically and neur
ochemically specific attenuation of the PFC DA response in stress. Given th
e pivotal role of the PFC in certain cognitive and affective processes, beh
avioral regulation of PFC DA utilization may modulate cognitive and/or affe
ctive function in stress. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.