Recent histories of the American curriculum have shown how citizen groups i
nfluenced local course offerings and state requirements during the early tw
entieth century. Using case studies of three subject areas-history, militar
y training and foreign languages-this article demonstrates that lay activis
ts also affected the content and even the enrollment of these courses. The
article illustrates the enormous range of citizens who entered curricular d
isputes, the diversity of strategies they employed, and the disparate resul
ts of their efforts. It also suggests a new explanation for the decline of
the traditional "3 R's" and the rise of a more "practical," differentiated
curriculum between the turn of the century and World War Two. Hardly the pa
wns of school officials, laypeople had their own "practical" reasons for em
bracing this trend: it opened the door to whatever new agendas they hoped t
o inject. Across the ideological spectrum, then, citizen groups joined hand
s to condemn old-fashioned academic curricula, Not until the late 1940s wou
ld conservative activists rally around the 3 R's, sparking a new school war
that still rages today.