Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers
Br. Thomas et al., Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers, THEOR A GEN, 98(5), 1999, pp. 793-801
We examined the effects of different methods of forest regeneration on the
genetic diversity of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var 'latifolia') using
two different DNA-based molecular markers [randomly amplified polymorphic D
NA (RAPDs) and microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs)]. Genetic
diversity was estimated for 30 individuals in each of four populations for
the following three stand types: (1) mature lodgepole pine(>100 years); (2)
20- to 30-year-old harvested stands left for natural regeneration; (3) 20-
to 30-year-old planted stands (4 stands of each type); and one group of 30
operationally produced seedlings. There was no significant effect of stand
type on expected heterozygosity, although allelic richness and diversity w
ere much higher for SSRs than for RAPDs. Expected heterozygosity ranged fro
m 0.39 to 0.47 based on RAPDs and from 0.67 to 0.77 based on SSRs. The numb
er of alleles per locus for SSRs ranged from 3 to 34 (mean 21.0), and there
was a significant relationship between sequence repeat length and the numb
er of alleles at a locus. Both marker types showed that over 94% of the var
iation was contained within the populations and that the naturally regenera
ted stands sampled had lower (not significant) expected heterozygosity than
the planted or unharvested stands. The group of seedlings (assessed by RAP
Ds only) had expected heterozygosity and allele frequencies similar to thos
e of the unharvested stands. Genetic distance measures were higher than obt
ained previously in the species using isozyme markers. There was no correla
tion between the two marker types for pair-wise genetic distances based on
populations analyzed by both methods. Pair-wise genetic distance measures a
nd an ordination of allele frequencies for both marker types showed little
effect of geographic location or stand type on genetic similarity.