Evaluation of the results of a L-asparaginase-based continuous chemotherapy protocol versus a short doxorubicin-based induction chemotherapy protocolin dogs with malignant lymphoma
Cj. Piek et al., Evaluation of the results of a L-asparaginase-based continuous chemotherapy protocol versus a short doxorubicin-based induction chemotherapy protocolin dogs with malignant lymphoma, VET Q, 21(2), 1999, pp. 44-49
The results of an L-asparaginase-based continuous chemotherapy protocol (n
= 52) versus a short doxorubicin-based induction chemotherapy protocol (n =
65) were evaluated in 117 dogs with malignant lymphoma. There were no diff
erences between the two groups in patient characteristics or incidence of p
rotocol-related toxicity. Complete remission was induced in 71.2% of the do
gs treated,vith the L-asparaginase protocol and in 67.7% of the dogs treate
d with the doxorubicin-plus protocol. The calculated Kaplan-Meier one- and
two-year survival fractions in the L-asparaginase group were 48% and 26%, a
nd in the doxorubicin-plus group 35%, and 22%, respectively. Differences in
remission and survival between the two treatment groups were not significa
nt. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis revealed that
elevated pretreatment plasma creatinine concentration and prior treatment
with prednisolone were associated with shorter survival times. An elevated
pretreatment plasma creatinine concentration and total leucocyte count were
associated with a decrease in the disease-free period. Differences in effi
cacy and toxicity between the two protocols were not significant. There is
no apparent advantage in using the continuous L-asparaginase protocol, and
the shorter dosorubicin-plus protocol is less expensive and less time consu
ming.