Evaluation of the results of a L-asparaginase-based continuous chemotherapy protocol versus a short doxorubicin-based induction chemotherapy protocolin dogs with malignant lymphoma

Citation
Cj. Piek et al., Evaluation of the results of a L-asparaginase-based continuous chemotherapy protocol versus a short doxorubicin-based induction chemotherapy protocolin dogs with malignant lymphoma, VET Q, 21(2), 1999, pp. 44-49
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
VETERINARY QUARTERLY
ISSN journal
01652176 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
44 - 49
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-2176(199904)21:2<44:EOTROA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The results of an L-asparaginase-based continuous chemotherapy protocol (n = 52) versus a short doxorubicin-based induction chemotherapy protocol (n = 65) were evaluated in 117 dogs with malignant lymphoma. There were no diff erences between the two groups in patient characteristics or incidence of p rotocol-related toxicity. Complete remission was induced in 71.2% of the do gs treated,vith the L-asparaginase protocol and in 67.7% of the dogs treate d with the doxorubicin-plus protocol. The calculated Kaplan-Meier one- and two-year survival fractions in the L-asparaginase group were 48% and 26%, a nd in the doxorubicin-plus group 35%, and 22%, respectively. Differences in remission and survival between the two treatment groups were not significa nt. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis revealed that elevated pretreatment plasma creatinine concentration and prior treatment with prednisolone were associated with shorter survival times. An elevated pretreatment plasma creatinine concentration and total leucocyte count were associated with a decrease in the disease-free period. Differences in effi cacy and toxicity between the two protocols were not significant. There is no apparent advantage in using the continuous L-asparaginase protocol, and the shorter dosorubicin-plus protocol is less expensive and less time consu ming.