A biomechanical comparison of screw and wire fixation with and without polymethylmethacrylate re-enforcement for acetabular osteotomy stabilization in dogs
Oi. Lanz et al., A biomechanical comparison of screw and wire fixation with and without polymethylmethacrylate re-enforcement for acetabular osteotomy stabilization in dogs, VET SURGERY, 28(3), 1999, pp. 161-170
Objective-Compare the biomechanical characteristics of screw and wire fixat
ion with and without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) re-enforcement for aceta
bular osteotomy stabilization in dogs.
Animals-Pelves removed from 8 adult mixed breed dogs weighing between 25 an
d 30 kg,
Procedure-The pubic symphysis of each pelvis was split and a central transv
erse acetabular osteotomy was performed. One hemipelvis from each dog was s
tabilized with the composite fixation (interfragmentary Kirschner wire, two
screws and a figure-of-eight orthopedic wire with PMMA). The contralateral
hemipelves was stabilized with an interfragmentary Kirschner wire, two scr
ews, and a figure-of-eight orthopedic wire without PMMA. All hemipelves wer
e tested in bending by using a materials testing machine at a cross head sp
eed of 5 mm/min. An extensometer was placed on the dorsomedial surface of t
he hemipelves centered over acetabular osteotomy to record distraction of t
he osteotomy during loading. A load/deformation curve and a load/distractio
n curve was produced for each hemipelvis. The slope for the initial linear
portion of the load/deformation curve and the load/distraction curve, yield
load and maximum load sustained were compared between repair groups using
a paired t-test with P < .05 considered significant.
Results-The slope of the load/deformation curve was significantly greater (
P = .001) for hemipelves stabilized with the composite fixation (mean +/- S
D: 69 +/- 18 N/mm) compared with hemipelves stabilized without PMMA (mean /- SD: 39 +/- 8 N/mm). There was no significant difference (P = .593) betwe
en repair groups in the slope of the load/distraction curves as measured on
the extensometer. Yield load was significantly greater (P = .0002) for hem
ipelves stabilized with the composite fixation (mean +/- SD: 184 +/- 25 N)
compared to hemipelves stabilized without PMMA (mean +/- SD: 74 +/- 12 N).
Maximum load sustained was also significantly greater (P = .013) for hemipe
lves stabilized with the composite fixation (mean +/- SD: 396 +/- 71 N) com
pared to hemipelves stabilized without PMMA (mean +/- SD: 255 +/- 94 N). Fa
ilure of hemipelves stabilized with the composite fixation occurred primari
ly by ventrolateral bending of the cranial and caudal pelvic segments at th
e osteotomy site. Failure of hemipelves stabilized without PMMA occurred by
ventrolateral bending of the cranial and caudal pelvic segments at the ost
eotomy site with pronounced concurrent ventrolateral rotation of the crania
l pelvic segment.
Conclusion-PMMA improves the mechanical characteristics of acetabular fract
ure fixation, at least in part by neutralization of rotational forces. The
results of this study justify use of PMMA as a component of the composite f
ixation when repairing acetabular fractures (C) Copyright 1999 by The Ameri
can College of Veterinary Surgeons.