CLINICIAN RELIABILITY AND ACCURACY IN JUDGING APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF CARE

Citation
L. Bickman et al., CLINICIAN RELIABILITY AND ACCURACY IN JUDGING APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF CARE, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 65(3), 1997, pp. 515-520
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
0022006X
Volume
65
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
515 - 520
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-006X(1997)65:3<515:CRAAIJ>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Accurately assigning children to the most appropriate level of care is widely recognized as important. Managed care companies conduct utiliz ation reviews in which they monitor the level of care to which clients are assigned using written placement criteria. However, no research h as examined the ability of clinicians to perform this task. In the pre sent study, 47 child and adolescent clinical profiles consisting of 48 variables were developed. Eighteen clinicians, trained to use their a gency's level-of-care guidelines, made level-of-care decisions on thes e profiles. Their interjudge reliability in assigning a child to an ap propriate level of care was close to zero (kappa =.07). There was a sm all, statistically significant correlation between client placement an d actual placement, but chance-corrected agreement between client plac ement and actual placement was very low (kappa =.09). Implications of these findings for clinical research, practice, policy, and training a re discussed.