Dm. Kennedy et al., Evaluation of different weight correction methods for antenatal serum screening using data from two multi-centre programmes, ANN CLIN BI, 36, 1999, pp. 359-364
Weight correction of serum markers is widely used when screening for Down's
syndrome and open neural tube defects (NTD) because marker concentrations
decrease with increasing maternal weight. Log-linear regression is frequent
ly used for determining weight correction factors, but recently reciprocal-
linear regression has been suggested to have advantages. We compared both m
ethods of weight correction using data from two screening programmes carrie
d out by this laboratory, one using alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and total human
chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (n = 129143) and the other, AFP and free bet
a-HCG (n = 39982). The reciprocal-linear method fitted the data more closel
y but did not significantly alter the detection rate or screen positive rat
e (SPR) for Down's syndrome or NTD with either dataset. Without correction,
women heavier or lighter than average weight had significantly different S
PRs for Down's syndrome and NTD compared with those weighing close to the m
edian weight. Both correction methods smoothed out the variability in the S
PR for Down's syndrome to a similar degree, but reciprocal-linear regressio
n was much better at reducing the variability in SPR for NTD and its use is
therefore worthwhile.