Sevoflurane exposure time and the neuromuscular blocking effect of vecuronium

Citation
Aak. Ahmed et al., Sevoflurane exposure time and the neuromuscular blocking effect of vecuronium, CAN J ANAES, 46(5), 1999, pp. 429-432
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
ISSN journal
0832610X → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Part
1
Pages
429 - 432
Database
ISI
SICI code
0832-610X(199905)46:5<429:SETATN>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effect of sevoflurane exposure time on the durati on of vecuronium neuromuscular blockade. Methods: In 40 adult patients anesthesia was induced with 1.5-2 mg.kg(-1) p ropofol and 3-5 mu g.kg(-1) fentanyl and the trachea was intubated without the aid of muscle relaxant. Patients were randomized into four groups of 10 . In group 1, 0.05 mg.kg(-1) vecuronium was administered with N2O and anest hesia was maintained by propofol infusion and fentanyl. Vecuronium was admi nistered with sevoflurane 2% in 30 patients, commencing at the same time (g roup 2) and at 30, and 60 min after sevoflurane (groups 3, 4). Adductor pol licis force of contraction to train-of-four ulnar nerve stimulation was rec orded. Times from vecuronium injection to 95%, maximal block, and recovery times to 25% recovery were recorded. Results: There were no differences in times to 95% and maximal block in the four groups. Recovery times were longer in groups 3 and 4 than in groups 2 and 1 (P < 0.01). Times to 5% recovery were 15.0 +/- 3.7, 17.8 +/- 4.8, 28 .2 +/- 9.9, and 29.5 +/- 9.5, and to 25% recovery were 22.3 +/- 5.2, 27.2 /- 6.4, 42.3 +/- 16.3, and 50.5 +/- 16.4 in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectiv ely. No differences were found between group 1 and group 2 nor between grou p 3 and group 4. Conclusion: Sevoflurane produced time-dependent potentiation of vecuronium. After 30 min exposure, 25% recovery was prolonged by 89% and after 60 min by more than 100% compared with the control group.