A. Bohme et al., Antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies: Is there a real benefit?, CHEMOTHERA, 45(3), 1999, pp. 224-232
Invasive fungal infections have been reported with an increasing incidence
over the last 20 years. Fungal infections are an important cause of morbidi
ty and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. Therefore, in
neutropenic patients different regimens of antifungal prophylaxis have bee
n performed for more than 20 years, but the effect of antifungal prophylaxi
s is controversial. A long duration of neutropenia, impaired cell-mediated
immunity as well as continuous corticosteroid therapy and sustained immunos
uppression for graft-versus-host disease in patients treated with allogenei
c bone marrow transplantation are known risk factors for invasive mycosis.
Since early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is difficult, strategies
to prevent fungal infections seem to be attractive. The introduction of tr
iazoles have provided us with a better armamentarium to prevent fungal infe
ctions. In this review, the current strategies of antifungal prophylaxis ar
e discussed. Antifungal prophylaxis has been effective in reducing candida
infection, however, there has been no proven successful prevention of invas
ive aspergillosis. In addition, there is no clearly proven benefit of antif
ungal prophylaxis regarding the reduction in the overall mortality. Thus th
e best way to reduce invasive fungal-related mortality will be early diagno
sis and preemptive therapeutic approaches.