Mueller roof reinforcement rings - Medium term results

Citation
P. Korovessis et al., Mueller roof reinforcement rings - Medium term results, CLIN ORTHOP, (362), 1999, pp. 125-137
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
ISSN journal
0009921X → ACNP
Issue
362
Year of publication
1999
Pages
125 - 137
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(199905):362<125:MRRR-M>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Short term results of cemented acetabular reconstruction with the use of th e Mueller reinforcement ring in 30 hips in 29 patients have been reported p reviously. The indications for reinforcement were primary and postrevision segmental, cavitary, and combined acetabular deficiencies, The current stud y reports the medium term clinical and radiologic results of 26 of the 29 p atients who were surgically treated (18 primary and eight postrevision hips ) and who underwent followup with detailed clinical and radiographic analys is within an average of 9 years (range, 7-12 years). In the latest followup , there has been a statistically insignificant decrease in clinical scores compared with those obtained immediately after surgery; the changes probabl y are a result of the patients' aging. The radiologic score's at the latest followup were lower, although not statistically significant, than those at the short term followup, The causes of the three ring failures that occurr ed 5, 8, and 8.5 years after surgery and required revision arthroplasty wer e either acute trauma or tuberculous arthritis. Three additional hips (two primary and one revision) had evidence of loosening in the ring and socket associated with symptomatology and were considered as hips with impending r evision. The rate of success of primary implantation was 94% at 7 years, 86 % at 10 years, and 86% at 12 years and was not statistically different from that of revision implantation, which was 86% in all three followup periods . In this small series this surgical technique was successful and effective and followed by good medium term clinical and radiographic results in prim ary and revision implantation in segmental, cavitary, or complex acetabular deficiencies and in osteoporotic or deficient acetabular bone.