In three experiments, children aged between 4 and 7 years viewed a circular
disc oriented at a slant. The disc was made of luminous material and situa
ted in a darkened chamber. Children of all ages exaggerated the circularity
of the disc when they knew that the object was really a circle (the circle
task), and the effect was greatest in the younger members of the sample. C
rucially, however, a group of children in Experiment 3 who viewed an identi
cal shape that they knew emanated from an actual ellipse did not exaggerate
circularity. In the second experiment, children tackled three standard the
ory of mind tasks in addition to the circle task mentioned above. A signifi
cant correlation emerged (even with age partialled) between the extent of e
xaggeration made by those who knew that the shape was a circle and ability
to pass the theory of mind tests. It seems knowledge of reality contaminate
s judgements of appearance in the circle task. This might be the same bias
that features in realist errors in theory of mind tasks. (C) 1999 Elsevier
Science B.V. All rights reserved.