Under normal-gravity conditions the flame heat release produces both flow d
ilatation and buoyancy effects. While it may be possible to minimize gravit
ational effects in a fully premixed flame by isolating buoyancy effects to
the lower-density postflame region or plume, this cannot be accomplished in
nonpremixed flames. It is known that partially premixed flames can contain
two reaction zones, one with a premixed-like structure and the other consi
sting of a transport-limited nonpremixed zone (in which mixing and entrainm
ent effects are significant). For these reasons it is important to understa
nd the fundamental interaction between flow dilatation and buoyancy effects
in partially premixed flames. A detailed numerical study is conducted to c
haracterize the effect of buoyancy on the structure of two-dimensional part
ially premixed methane-air flames. The computational model is validated by
comparison with the experimentally obtained chemiluminescent emission from
excited-C-2* Gee radical species as well as with velocity vectors obtained
using particle image velocimetry. Both the experiments and simulations indi
cate the presence of two reaction zones that are synergistically coupled, w
ith each region providing heat and/or chemical species for the other. While
the inner premixed flame is only weakly affected by gravity, the outer fla
me shows significant spatial differences for the two cases due to buoyancy-
induced entrainment, since advection of air into the outer reaction zone in
creases in the presence of gravity. The presence of gravity induces more co
mpact flames, influences the velocity profiles in the post-inner flame regi
on, and increases the normal strain rate. Although the spatial differences
between the 0- and 1-g flames are more significant on the lean side, the st
ate relationships in that region are relatively unaffected by gravity. On t
he other hand, the inner (rich-side) reaction zone shifts toward less-rich
locations in the presence of gravity, possibly due to the enhanced buoyant
mixing. The 1-g flames exhibit a larger energy loss in the form of CO and H
-2 emissions. (C) 1999 by The Combustion Institute.