Perceived judicial hostility to criminal trials - Effects on public defenders in general and on their relationships with clients and prosecutors in particular

Authors
Citation
Dr. Lynch, Perceived judicial hostility to criminal trials - Effects on public defenders in general and on their relationships with clients and prosecutors in particular, CRIM JUST B, 26(2), 1999, pp. 217-234
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR
ISSN journal
00938548 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
217 - 234
Database
ISI
SICI code
0093-8548(199906)26:2<217:PJHTCT>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
It is clear that plea bargaining has become the primary method for criminal case disposition in the United States. It also is likely that defense atto rneys, like other courtroom work group actors, generally benefit from such an expedited system of justice. What is less clear, however, is the degree that they may feel stressed by getting too much of a good thing. This artic le presents data that suggest that judicially created "no-trial option" env ironments rank among the highest of potential stressors confronting public defenders. Apart from the strong general effects such environments have on defenders, regression analyses suggest that such environments tend to moder ately exacerbate defender-client and defender-prosecutor conflicts as well.