Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium nasal spr
ay and placebo administered twice each day for 4 weeks in pediatric pa
tients with perennial rhinitis who had rhinorrhea as a major complaint
. Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study.
Patients aged 6 to 18 years with symptoms of perennial nonallergic (P
NAR) or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) were randomized to receive i
pratropium (42 mu g per nostril) or placebo nasal spray, double-blind,
twice each day for 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated by nasal symptoms,
especially anterior rhinorrhea, and quality of life. Previous caregiv
ers for rhinitis and medications used in the past were also evaluated.
Results: A total of 202 patients were empanelled, 162 with PAR, 40 wi
th PNAR; of these 151 with mild-severe rhinorrhea were evaluated for e
fficacy. Treatment with ipratropium reduced symptoms of rhinorrhea pri
marily in patients with PNAR. In patients with PAR this response was l
ess pronounced, and was seen as a modest decrease in the severity of r
hinorrhea noted in the first 2 weeks of treatment. Quality of life ass
essments confirmed that rhinorrhea was bothersome to these pediatric p
atients, and suggested that treatment with ipratropium nasal spray was
associated with an improvement, especially in the patients with PNAR.
There were few adverse events; these were similar in the two treatmen
t groups. Conclusions: Ipratropium nasal spray 0.03% administered at a
dose of 42 mu g/nostril bid is a safe and effective new therapy for c
ontrol of anterior rhinorrhea in pediatric patients with PNAR. Twice d
aily administration is adequate for patients with PNAR, but patients w
ith PAR might benefit from more frequent administration (eg, rid).