Jc. Rodriguezsanjuan et al., CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND FISTULA CLOSURE VERSUS ENTEROLITHOTOMY ALONE IN GALLSTONE ILEUS, British Journal of Surgery, 84(5), 1997, pp. 634-637
Background The management of gallstone ileus is controversial. This st
udy compared the results of simple enterolithotomy with those of enter
olithotomy, cholecystectomy and fistula closure. Methods A retrospecti
ve analysis was made of 25 patients with a mean age of 75 (range 55-84
) years. Enterolithotomy was performed in 16 patients (group 1) and ch
olecystectomy and fistula closure were added in nine patients (group 2
). Results The diagnosis was made before operation in 12 patients, and
was associated with previous biliary disorder (P = 0.03) and pneumobi
lia (P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity occurred in eight patients in
group 1 and in six in group 2. Three patients died in each group; all
but one of the deaths were unrelated to the surgical procedure. There
was no relationship between age and mortality, and patients in Americ
an Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes III and IV did not have
higher rates of morbidity or mortality than those in ASA classes I and
II. Conclusion Evidence from this study does not support one-stage en
terolithotomy, cholecystectomy and fistula closure as the procedure of
choice; simple enterolithotomy is appropriate in most patients, Howev
er, the one-stage procedure may be acceptable in patients at low risk.