S. Mendez-delgado et al., Forward modelling of direct current and low-frequency electromagnetic fields using integral equations, GEOPHYS J I, 137(2), 1999, pp. 336-352
We present a semi-analytical, unifying approach for modelling the electroma
gnetic response of 3-D bodies excited by low-frequency electric and magneti
c sources. We write the electric and magnetic fields in terms of power seri
es of angular frequency, and show that to obey Maxwell's equations, the fie
lds must be real when the exponent is even, and imaginary when it is odd. T
his leads to the result that the scattering equations for direct current fi
elds and for fields proportional to frequency can both be explicitly formul
ated using a single, real dyadic Green's function. Although the underground
current flow in each case is due to different physical phenomena, the inte
raction of the scattering currents is of the same type in both cases. This
implies that direct current resistivity, magnetometric resistivity and elec
tric and magnetic measurements at low induction numbers can all be modelled
in parallel using basically the same algorithm. We make a systematic deriv
ation of the quantities required and show that for these cases they can all
be expressed analytically. The problem is finally formulated as the soluti
on of a system of linear equations. The matrix of the system is real and do
es not depend on the type of source or receiver. We present modelling resul
ts for different arrays and apply the algorithm to the interpretation of fi
eld data. We assume the standard dipole-dipole resistivity array for the di
rect current case, and vertical and horizontal magnetic dipoles for inducti
on measurements. In the case of magnetometric resistivity we introduce a mo
ving array composed of an electric dipole and a directional magnetometer, T
he array has multiple separations for depth discrimination and can operate
in two modes, The mode where the predominant current flow runs along the pr
ofile is called MMR-TM. This mode is more sensitive to lateral variations i
n resistivity than its counterpart, MMR-TE, where the mode of conduction is
predominantly perpendicular to the profile.