Constraints on the frequency-magnitude relation and maximum magnitudes in the UK from observed seismicity and glacio-isostatic recovery rates

Citation
I. Main et al., Constraints on the frequency-magnitude relation and maximum magnitudes in the UK from observed seismicity and glacio-isostatic recovery rates, GEOPHYS J I, 137(2), 1999, pp. 535-550
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0956540X → ACNP
Volume
137
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
535 - 550
Database
ISI
SICI code
0956-540X(199905)137:2<535:COTFRA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Earthquake populations have recently been shown to have many similarities w ith critical-point phenomena, with fractal scaling of source sizes (energy or seismic moment) corresponding to the observed Gutenberg-Richter (G-R) fr equency-magnitude law holding at low magnitudes. At high magnitudes, the fo rm of the distribution depends on the seismic moment release rate (M)over d ot and the maximum magnitude m(max). The G-R law requires a sharp truncatio n at an absolute maximum magnitude for finite (M)over dot. In contrast, the gamma distribution has an exponential tail which allows a soft or 'credibl e' maximum to be determined by negligible contribution to the total seismic moment release. Here we apply both distributions to seismic hazard in the mainland UK and its immediate continental shelf, constrained by a mixture o f instrumental, historical and neotectonic data. Tectonic moment release ra tes for the seismogenic part of the lithosphere are calculated from a flexu ral-plate model for glacio-isostatic recovery, constrained by vertical defo rmation rates from tide-gauge and geomorphological data. Earthquake focal m echanisms in the UK show near-vertical strike-slip faulting, with implied d irections of maximum compressive stress approximately in the NNW-SSE direct ion, consistent with the tectonic model. Maximum magnitudes are found to be in the range 6.3-7.5 for the G-R law, or 7.0-8.2 m(L) for the gamma distri bution, which compare with a maximum observed in the time period of interes t of 6.1 m(L). The upper bounds are conservative estimates, based on 100 pe r cent seismic release of the observed vertical neotectonic deformation. Gl acio-isostatic recovery is predominantly an elastic rather than a seismic p rocess, so the true value of m(max) is likely to be nearer the lower end of the quoted range.