I. Main et al., Constraints on the frequency-magnitude relation and maximum magnitudes in the UK from observed seismicity and glacio-isostatic recovery rates, GEOPHYS J I, 137(2), 1999, pp. 535-550
Earthquake populations have recently been shown to have many similarities w
ith critical-point phenomena, with fractal scaling of source sizes (energy
or seismic moment) corresponding to the observed Gutenberg-Richter (G-R) fr
equency-magnitude law holding at low magnitudes. At high magnitudes, the fo
rm of the distribution depends on the seismic moment release rate (M)over d
ot and the maximum magnitude m(max). The G-R law requires a sharp truncatio
n at an absolute maximum magnitude for finite (M)over dot. In contrast, the
gamma distribution has an exponential tail which allows a soft or 'credibl
e' maximum to be determined by negligible contribution to the total seismic
moment release. Here we apply both distributions to seismic hazard in the
mainland UK and its immediate continental shelf, constrained by a mixture o
f instrumental, historical and neotectonic data. Tectonic moment release ra
tes for the seismogenic part of the lithosphere are calculated from a flexu
ral-plate model for glacio-isostatic recovery, constrained by vertical defo
rmation rates from tide-gauge and geomorphological data. Earthquake focal m
echanisms in the UK show near-vertical strike-slip faulting, with implied d
irections of maximum compressive stress approximately in the NNW-SSE direct
ion, consistent with the tectonic model. Maximum magnitudes are found to be
in the range 6.3-7.5 for the G-R law, or 7.0-8.2 m(L) for the gamma distri
bution, which compare with a maximum observed in the time period of interes
t of 6.1 m(L). The upper bounds are conservative estimates, based on 100 pe
r cent seismic release of the observed vertical neotectonic deformation. Gl
acio-isostatic recovery is predominantly an elastic rather than a seismic p
rocess, so the true value of m(max) is likely to be nearer the lower end of
the quoted range.