Negotiations about the appointment to a chair are taboo. After a 27-year pr
ofessorship and a 4-year dean's term of office, I face up to some questions
from an admittedly subjective and restricted Austrian point of view: Do we
really choose the best candidates or is it often a lobby which decides irr
espective of the personal responsibility of the commission members? Do thei
r large number and their knowledge allow an assessment of performance? Is t
he impact factor or the clinical experience in the centre of the discussion
? Are there equal opportunities for colleagues with an oncological or gynae
cological background? Was the institution of a working group for questions
concerning equality of female candidates any good?