Safety and efficacy of using a single agent or a phase II agent before instituting standard combination chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: Report of a randomized study - Cancer and leukemia group B 8642
Me. Costanza et al., Safety and efficacy of using a single agent or a phase II agent before instituting standard combination chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: Report of a randomized study - Cancer and leukemia group B 8642, J CL ONCOL, 17(5), 1999, pp. 1397-1406
Purpose: We undertook a prospective, randomized phase III trial to evaluate
the safety and efficacy of using a phase II agent before initiating therap
y with standard combination chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patien
ts.
Patients and Methods: A total of 365 women with measurable metastatic breas
t cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy for their metastatic disea
se, were randomized to receive either immediate chemotherapy with cyclophos
phamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) or up to four cycles of one of
five sequential cohorts of single-agent drugs: trimetrexate, melphalan, am
onafide, carboplatin, or elsamitrucin, followed by CAF,
Results: The toxicity of each single agent followed by CAF was comparable t
o that of CAF alone. The cumulative response rates for the single agent fol
lowed by CAF were not statistically different from those of CAF alone (44%
v 52%; P = 24) However. in the multivariate analysis, patients with viscera
l disease had a trend toward lower response rates on the phase II agent plu
s CAF arm (P =.078). Although survival and response duration also were not
statistically significantly different between the two study arms (P =.074 a
nd P =.069, respectively), there was a suggestion of benefit for the CAF-on
ly arm.
Conclusion: The brief use of a phase II agent, regardless of its efficacy,
followed by CAF resulted in response rates, toxicities, durations of respon
se, and survival statistically equivalent to those seen with the use of CAF
alone. These findings support the use of a new paradigm for the evaluation
of phase II agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast can
cer. J Clin Oncol 17:1397-1406. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical On
cology.