Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy

Purpose: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinbla stine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing desp ite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (n = 203) or mitomyc in 12 mg/m(2) IV every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks (n = 189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantl y higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P <.0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median r ime to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer wit h docetaxel than MV(19 v 11 weeks, P =.001, and 11.4 v 8.7 months, P =.0097 , respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93 .1% v 62.5%; P <.05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV( 12.0% v 4.1%; P <.05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse event s were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse event s (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a numb er of factors, but results were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable an d tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients wit h MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:1413-1424. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology .