Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine combination therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II randomized study of the Southern ItalyCooperative Oncology Group
P. Comella et al., Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine combination therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II randomized study of the Southern ItalyCooperative Oncology Group, J CL ONCOL, 17(5), 1999, pp. 1526-1534
Purpose: In a previous phase I study cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM), a
nd vinorelbine (VNR) combination therapy was safe and very active in patien
ts with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was aimed at better
defining the activity and toxicity of this regimen.
Patients and Methods: One hundred eleven chemotherapy-naive patients, age l
ess than or equal to 70 years, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a performanc
e status of 0 or 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) were randomiz
ed to two treatment arms. Patients on arm A received CDDP 50 mg/m(2), GEM 1
,000 mg/m(2), and VNR 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of an every-3-weeks cycle
(57 patients). Patients on arm B received CDDP 80 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg
/m(2), and vindesine 3 mg/m(2), all delivered on day 1 every 4 weeks, plus
lonidamine orally 150 mg three times daily (54 patients). In December 1996,
randomization was stopped early, and an additional 30 patients were treate
d with the experimental regimen to obtain a more accurate estimation of its
activity rare.
Results: Among 87 patients who received the CDDP-GEM-VNR combination, four
complete responses (CRs) and 46 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for
an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 68%).
Two CRs and 18 PRs were recorded among 54 patients on arm B, giving a 37%
activity rate (95% CI, 24% to 51%). After a median follow-up duration of 19
months, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were 32
and 50 weeks in arm A, and 18 and 33 weeks in arm B, respectively. World H
ealth Organization grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred i
n 46% and 14% of patients in arm A and in 22% and 11% of those in arm B, re
spectively. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon in both arms.
Conclusion: The CDDP-GEM-VNR combination is a highly effective treatment fo
r patients with advanced NSCLC and has a manageable toxicity A phase III tr
ial comparing this new combination with both CDDP-VNR and CDDP-GEM regimens
is underway J Clin Oncol 17:1526-1534. (C) 1999 by American Society of Cli
nical Oncology.