EVALUATION OF IOPENTOL (IMAGOPAQUE(R)-350) IN CT ENHANCEMENT - A MULTICENTER MONITORING TRIAL ASSESSING ADVERSE EVENTS AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION - RESULTS FROM 1,823 PATIENTS IN FRANCE
M. Oxaal et al., EVALUATION OF IOPENTOL (IMAGOPAQUE(R)-350) IN CT ENHANCEMENT - A MULTICENTER MONITORING TRIAL ASSESSING ADVERSE EVENTS AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION - RESULTS FROM 1,823 PATIENTS IN FRANCE, European radiology, 7, 1997, pp. 109-114
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of iopentol 350 mg I/m
l (Imagopaque(R)/Ivepaque(R), Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo, Norway), a mon
omeric non-ionic contrast medium for computed tomography, in a large p
opulation. To identify predictive factors for patient safety. Material
s and methods: One thousand eight hundred and twenty-three (1,823) pat
ients from 48 centres in France were included during a 5-month period.
Safety was evaluated by registering adverse events (AEs) reported by
the patients, and data were analysed using a multiple factor model. Re
sults: Only 2.6% of the patients experienced AEs other than discomfort
. There were no serious AEs. Overall, AEs were more frequent in patien
ts under 50 years of age, in women, and in patients who received contr
ast medium as a single bolus. Contrast enhancement was considered adeq
uate or better in 98.9% of the patients. A large variation in discomfo
rt (local warmth/chill or pain) frequency was seen between centres, ra
nging from 0% to 81%. This result implies that factors other than the
CM influence the incidence of discomfort. Conclusions: This first stud
y in a large population shows that iopentol 350 mg I/ml is well tolera
ted and provides CT images of excellent, good or adequate quality in t
he vast majority of patients. Age, sex and injection procedure were sh
own to be independent predictors in the AE survey.