IOPENTOL (IMAGOPAQUE(R)-350) COMPARED WITH IOHEXOL (OMNIPAQUE(R)-350)IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY - A CLINICAL-TRIAL ASSESSING ADVERSE EVENTS, ECG, BLOOD-PRESSURE AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION
M. Kunnen et al., IOPENTOL (IMAGOPAQUE(R)-350) COMPARED WITH IOHEXOL (OMNIPAQUE(R)-350)IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY - A CLINICAL-TRIAL ASSESSING ADVERSE EVENTS, ECG, BLOOD-PRESSURE AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION, European radiology, 7, 1997, pp. 123-126
A non-ionic, monomeric, low-osmolar contrast medium, iopentol (Imagopa
que(R), Nycomed Imaging aging AS, Oslo, Norway) has been compared with
iohexol (Omnipaque(R), Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo, Norway) in a double-
blind, randomized, parallel-group trial in children. The aims of the s
tudy were to compare the safety and radiographic efficacy of iopentol
350 mg I/ml versus those of iohexol 350 mg I/ml in pediatric cardioang
iography. Seventy-three children, of whom 35 received iopentol and 35
iohexol, were included in the evaluation. The quality of overall diagn
ostic information was excellent or adequate in all patients. There wer
e no statistically significant differences between numbers of patients
reporting adverse events nor number of patients reporting discomfort
in the two groups. Three patients in iopentol group and two patients i
n the iohexol group reported adverse events. Heat sensation was report
ed by 4 patients in the iopentol group and 5 patients in the iohexol g
roup. Following injection of contrast medium, there were no difference
s between the groups regarding ECG, heart rate and systolic. blood pre
ssure at the site of injection. Iopentol was demonstrated to be as eff
ective, safe and well tolerated as iohexol in pediatric cardioangiogra
phy.