The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma can pose several problems to t
he surgical pathologist. First, the morphological appearances of the t
umour are known to be diverse with mimicry of a range of both reactive
and neoplastic conditions. Second, due to the relative inaccessibilit
y of the serosa, biopsy material is often scanty and fragmentary, prod
ucing a plethora of interpretive ambiguities. Third, adjunct technique
s such as mucin histochemistry and immunohistochemistry, whilst useful
in excluding malignant mesothelioma have little role in confirming th
e diagnosis. The accurate diagnosis of diffuse malignant mesothelioma
is important for two reasons: (1) In relation to prognosis as it has a
n almost invariable fatal outcome, which contrasts with the other meso
thelial neoplasms such as the benign adenomatoid tumour and the border
line malignant tumours, namely the well-differentiated papillary mesot
helioma and multicystic mesothelioma; (2) In relation to occupational-
related compensation claims following asbestos exposure. This review s
ummarizes the aetiology of asbestos-induced neoplasia, possible mechan
isms of tumour development and highlights potential diagnostic pitfall
s.