In this article, the authors examine the circumstances in which brand names
convey information about unobservable quality. They argue that a brand nam
e can convey unobservable quality credibly when false claims will result in
intolerable economic losses, These losses can occur for two reasons: (1) l
osses of reputation or sunk investments and (2) losses of future profits th
at occur whether or not the brand has a reputation. The authors test this a
ssertion in the context of the emerging practice of brand alliances. Result
s from several studies are supportive of the premise and suggest that, when
evaluating a product that has an important unobservable attribute, consume
rs' quality perceptions are enhanced when a brand is allied with a second b
rand that is perceived to be vulnerable to consumer sanctions. The authors
discuss the theoretical and substantive implications for the area of brand
management.