Testing isokinetic muscular fatigue of shoulder internal and external rotation in elite junior tennis players

Citation
Ts. Ellenbecker et Ep. Roetert, Testing isokinetic muscular fatigue of shoulder internal and external rotation in elite junior tennis players, J ORTHOP SP, 29(5), 1999, pp. 275-281
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY
ISSN journal
01906011 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
275 - 281
Database
ISI
SICI code
0190-6011(199905)29:5<275:TIMFOS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Study Design: Single group, post-test only descriptive analysis of isokinet ically measured shoulder internal and external rotation muscular fatigue. Objectives: To determine whether differences in isokinetically measured mus cular fatigue exist between shoulder external (ER) and internal rotation (I R) and between the dominant (DOM) and nondominant (NDOM) extremity in elite junior tennis players. Background: The importance of the rotator cuff in stabilizing the humeral h ead during repetitive athletic overhead motions has been identified in biom echanical investigations. The application of exercise to improve muscular f unction of the shoulder and prevent injury is a common practice in physical therapy, but shoulder fatigue in tennis players has received little attent ion in the literature. Methods and Measures: Seventy-two elite junior tennis players (ages 12 to 1 8) underwent bilateral isokinetic testing with 90 degrees of glenohumeral j oint abduction. A muscular fatigue protocol consisting of 20 maximal-effort concentric contractions of ER and IR was used to measure muscular fatigue at 300 degrees/s. A relative fatigue ratio was calculated by dividing the w ork in the last 10 repetitions by the work in the first 10 repetitions. Hig her fatigue ratios indicate improved muscular fatigue resistance. A 2 x 2 A NOVA was used to assess differences in fatigue in DOM versus NDOM arm, and in IR versus ER. Results: Relative muscular fatigue ratios for ER and IR were 69.1 +/- 15.3% and 82.93 +/- 14.81% for the DOM extremity, respectively. In the NDOM extr emity ER and IR fatigue ratios were 71.13 +/- 15.07% and 83.9 +/- 16.5%, re spectively. These results indicate significant differences between the fati gue ratios for ER and IR. No significant difference between extremities in either ER or IR relative fatigue ratios was found. Conclusions: These data have implications for rehabilitation and conditioni ng of the rotator cuff musculature.