The American Institutes for Research (AIR) recently produced a report on th
e effectiveness of US government-funded research in demonstrating the exist
ence of a remote viewing effect that could be used for intelligence-gatheri
ng purposes. The most recent studies in this program were carried out by Sc
ience Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and these studies were
the focus of the assessment. The evaluators concluded that the ten SAIC stu
dies reviewed contained no obvious flaws. One of the evaluators used eight
methodological criteria to assess the studies, and chose one of the experim
ents-Experiment One-to demonstrate the use of the criteria: the experiment
appeared to satisfy all eight. The publication of this report prompted the
first author (R. W.) to become interested in attempting to replicate the SA
IC research into remote viewing. Before doing so, R. W. examined the protoc
ol used in Experiment One as a potential template for the replication. This
examination uncovered a number of possible pathways of information leakage
apparently present in the study. In addition, problems were encountered by
the SAIC team in reconstructing a number of unrecorded procedural details
concerning Experiment One. The implications of this assessment for Experime
nt One and the AIR report are discussed.