OBJECTIVES: Most clinico-neuropathological correlative studies of Alzheimer
's Disease (AD) are based on research cohorts that are not necessarily gene
ralizable to patients seen in the general medical community. In this study,
we examine the accuracy of the criteria used in diagnosing AD in a communi
ty-based case series of patients with memory complaints.
DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Clinical and neuropathological diagnoses were obta
ined from 134 patients evaluated for dementia who subsequently underwent au
topsy.
SETTING: Subjects who exhibited new symptoms of dementia and were enrolled
in the University of Washington/Group Health Cooperative Alzheimer's Diseas
e Patient Registry were eligible for this study.
MEASUREMENTS: Clinico-pathological correlation was performed using NINCDS-A
DRDA (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and St
roke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association) and CER
AD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) criteria.
RESULTS: Ninety-five of the 134 cases studied met CERAD neuropathological c
riteria for AD. The sensitivity of NINCDS-ADRDA "probable AD" was 83 % (dia
gnosing AD correctly) and overall clinical diagnostic accuracy was 75%. How
ever, there was a high rate of additional neuropathological findings. Only
34 of the 94 cases had pure AD on neuropathology, whereas the remainder fre
quently had coexisting vascular or Parkinson's disease lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study of a large series of community-based incident demen
tia cases provides a way of judging the adequacy of currently available cli
nical diagnostic criteria. It also shows that co-existing neuropathological
findings are common in community-based A.D.