Vasectomy and prostate cancer

Citation
Sm. Lesko et al., Vasectomy and prostate cancer, J UROL, 161(6), 1999, pp. 1848-1852
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
161
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1848 - 1852
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(199906)161:6<1848:VAPC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Purpose: Vasectomy has been associated with an increased risk of prostate c ancer in some previous studies but not in others. We evaluated the associat ion in a population based, case control study in Massachusetts. Materials and Methods: Included in our study were 1,216 patients younger th an 70 years with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and 1,400 controls with no history of prostate cancer who were matched to patients by age and town of residence. Data on vasectomy and potential confounding factors were obtain ed by telephone interview, and confounding was controlled by conditional lo gistic regression analysis. Results: Overall 16% of patients and 15% of controls had undergone vasectom y. Compared, with no vasectomy the odds ratio for ever having undergone vas ectomy was 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 1.3), which did not var y significantly by age at or interval since vasectomy. In men who reported urological symptoms and those without symptoms the odds ratio was 0.9 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.2) and 1.4 (1.0 to 1.9), respectively. In men younger than 55 y ears and those 55 years old or older at, diagnosis of prostate cancer the o dds ratio was 1.0 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.3) and 1.9 (1.2 to 3.2), respectively, I n the younger men with stages A or B and C or D disease the odds ratio was 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.3) and 1.3 (0.5 to 3.5), respectively. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the hypothesis that vasectomy incr eases the risk of prostate cancer in men older than 55 years. Further study is needed to determine whether the observed association between vasectomy and prostate cancer in men younger than 55 years is due to chance, detectio n bias or a causal effect.