Intensive chemotherapy with hematopoietic cell transplantation after ESHAPtherapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Results of a single-centre study of 65 patients
C. Soussain et al., Intensive chemotherapy with hematopoietic cell transplantation after ESHAPtherapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Results of a single-centre study of 65 patients, LEUK LYMPH, 33(5-6), 1999, pp. 543-550
This study was designed to assess the results of protracted courses of ESHA
P (etoposide, cyt arabine, cisplatin, methylprednisolone) therapy followed
by intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation (IC+HCT) f
or relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Treatment consisted
of 3 cycles of ESHAP; responsive patients (pts) then received 3 more cycle
s, and IC+HCT was used for pts in maintained partial (PR) or complete (CR)
remission after the sixth ESHAP. Sixty-five pts entered the study. At enrol
lment, 27 pts had bone marrow (BM) and/or central nervous system (CNS) lymp
homatous infiltration. Disease status was primary refractory lymphoma in 41
pts (63%), and relapse in 24 pts (37%). Results showed that two pts were n
ot evaluable for the therapeutic response because of early treatment-relate
d death. Thirty-nine (62%) pts entered PR or CR after 3 cycles of ESHAP. El
even pts subsequently had disease progression. Twenty-eight pts were in per
sistent CR or PR after 6 cycles of ESHAP. Refractory pts did not show a dif
ferent response rate to relapsing pts (chi(2) = 1.73). Five pts were exclud
ed from IC+HCT because of an inadequate graft or treatment-related toxicity
. Twenty-three (35%) pts completed the procedure. Five pts (22%) relapsed a
fter IC+HCT. The overall survival rate of the 39 responsive pts is 45% at 6
0 months, with a median survival time of 30 months. Median survival among t
he 35 pts in whom second-line chemotherapy failed is 7.1 months, with a 4-y
ear survival rate of 3%. Despite the poor prognostic features of this group
, 45% of pts responding to the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy are in prolon
ged remission, suggesting that rather than to transplant after just 2 cycle
s of salvage therapy, pursuing second-line chemotherapy may better discrimi
nate between patients more likely to benefit from a subsequent transplant.