Pavese and Umilta found that, in an enumeration task, Stroop-like interfere
nce is larger when the digit identity is symbolically close to the enumerat
ion response than when it is symbolically far. In two experiments testing 4
9 undergraduates, we further explored this phenomenon using Francolini and
Egeth's paradigm. We found that symbolic distance affected interference eve
n when the stimulus was briefly presented and masked. In Exp. 2, which test
ed numerosities outside the subitizing range, individuals used a different
enumeration strategy but showed the same symbolic distance effect. These re
sults support the hypothesis that Stroop interference found in enumeration
tasks depends on a rapid and automatic activation of digits' magnitude repr
esentation.