Background: Continuous improvement of dual chamber DDD pacemakers, electrod
e stability and programmed sequential stimulation changed the prognosis of
patients implanted with these devices. Aim: To report our experience with t
he use of dual chamber pacemakers. Material and methods: One hundred sevent
y six patients (116 male), aged 13 to 91 years old, who received a dual cha
mber pacemaker implant, are reported. Patients were followed for a mean of
2.6 years. Results: Indications for DDD pacemaker were complete atrioventri
cular block in 43%, sick sinus syndrome in 32%, paroxysmal A-V block in 24%
. All pacemakers were Siemens-Pacesetter and were provided with an automati
c sensing and threshold device. J shaped atrium electrodes were used in 78%
of patients and screw-in electrodes in 22%. Post operative complications w
ere displacement of atrial electrode in 8 patients, of ventricular electrod
e in 6 patients, infection in two patient and a hematoma in one. Chronic pa
rameters, measured after six months, were within expected ranges and allowe
d a good reprogramming of pacemakers. Long term programming aimed to reduce
battery depletion, enhance device performance and improve hemodynamic cond
itions. Normal sequential stimulation was achieved in 154 patients (87%), 1
4 (85) patients died of cardiovascular disease not related to pacemaker fun
ction. Eight patients were in atrial fibrillation and were reprogrammed to
VVI and DDI modes. Conclusions: DDD pacemakers are reliable and afford symp
tomatic relief in a broad spectrum of patients.