Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trial

Citation
M. Dougados et al., Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trial, RHEUMATOLOG, 38(3), 1999, pp. 235-244
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
Journal title
RHEUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
14620324 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
235 - 244
Database
ISI
SICI code
1462-0324(199903)38:3<235:ASWITO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective. To consider the relevance of the duration of a clinical trial in ankylosing spondylitis: long-term (i.e. 1 yr) vs short-term (i.e. 6 weeks) assessment of a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-placebo contro lled study. Methods. The design was a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-c ontrolled study of 6 weeks duration with a 12 months double-blind extension . Study drugs were placebo (n = 121) or active NSAID (n = 352). A decrease of at least 50% in pain and/or global assessment and/or functional impairme nt during the study defined the response to treatment. The percentage of pa tients discontinuing the study drug over time (life table analysis) permitt ed the evaluation of both the efficacy and toxicity. Results. Among the 473 recruited patients, the percentage of responders was similar at 1 yr and week 6 with a highly statistically significant differe nce in favour of the active NSAID groups when compared to placebo (at 1 yr, 17% in the placebo group vs 37, 50 and 43% in the piroxicam 20 mg, meloxic am 15 mg and meloxicam 22.5 mg, respectively, for the patient's overall ass essment) without any statistically significant difference between the three active groups. However, evaluation of the patients discontinuing the study drug during the 1 yr of the study permitted the detection of a statistical ly significant difference between the active NSAID groups. A lower percenta ge of patients taking meloxicam 22.5 mg had to discontinue the study drug w hen compared to either meloxicam 15 mg or piroxicam 20 mg (37% vs 53% and 5 3%, respectively, P < 0.05). By 52 weeks, drug-related upper gastrointestin al adverse events occurred in 13, 32, 20 and 18% in the placebo, piroxicam 20 mg, meloxicam 15 mg and meloxicam 22.5 mg groups, respectively. Some of the adverse events occurred only after week 6. Conclusion. This study suggests that a 1 yr trial might be of optimum value compared to a 6 week assessment in order to define better the efficacy and tolerability of NSAIDs in ankylosing spondylitis.