Low-field MRI of the knee joint: results of a prospective, arthroscopically controlled study.

Citation
Kf. Kreitner et al., Low-field MRI of the knee joint: results of a prospective, arthroscopically controlled study., ROFO-F RONT, 170(1), 1999, pp. 35-40
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
ISSN journal
09366652 → ACNP
Volume
170
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
35 - 40
Database
ISI
SICI code
0936-6652(199901)170:1<35:LMOTKJ>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Purpose: To define the diagnostic accuracy of an open low-field MR unit (Ma gnetom Open(R), Siemens, Erlangen) in traumatic knee lesions. Materials and Methods: The MRIs of 150 patients were prospectively evaluated by two inde pendent readers with different experience levels. The study protocol includ ed a proton-density weighted SE-sequence in the sagittal, a T-2*-weighted F lash-2D-sequence in the coronal, and a 3D-acquisition (DESS) in the axial p lane. 75 patients were treated either conservatively or operatively. Result s: Based on arthroscopy as the gold standard, the sensitivities, specificit ies, and diagnostic accuracies for lesions of the medial and lateral menisc us, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the hyaline cartilage, and the po sterior cruciate ligament (PCL) were 92%, 92% and 92%, 83%, 93% and 92%, 95 %, 96% and 96%, 74%, 93% and 85%, and 100%, respectively, for reader 1. The values for reader 2 were 81%, 74% and 77% (medial meniscus), 61%, 86% and 80% (lateral meniscus), 79%, 95% and 91% (ACL), 48%, 91% and 73% (hyaline c artilage), and 100% each (PCL), respectively. There were no statistical dif ferences between the two readers (Fisher's Exact Test, 95%-confidence inter val). Conclusions: Using a time-consuming examination protocol, the diagnos tic accuracies of the:open low-field MR unit are well comparable to those o btained with mid- or high-field units. Although not statistically significa nt in this study, the experience level of the examiner seems to be of consi derable clinical relevance.