The roles of amantadine, rimantadine, ursodeoxycholic acid, and NSAIDs, alone or in combination with alpha interferons, in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C
Zm. Younossi et Rp. Perrillo, The roles of amantadine, rimantadine, ursodeoxycholic acid, and NSAIDs, alone or in combination with alpha interferons, in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, SEM LIV DIS, 19, 1999, pp. 95-102
Although alpha interferons are currently the standard treatments for chroni
c hepatitis C, they are effective in only 15% to 20% of patients. This low
success rare has prompted research into new approaches for maximizing respo
nses to alpha interferons. A variety of drugs have been investigated alone
or in combination with alpha interferons. Of these agents, ribavirin is cur
rently the most promising adjuvant, and the combination therapy of ribaviri
n plus recombinant interferon alfa-2b is reviewed in detail elsewhere ii? t
his issue (see Davis article, pp. 49-55; and McHutchison article, pp. 57-65
). This article reviews the literature concerning studies, of amantadine, r
imantadine, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs), which are the most commonly used alternatives to ribavirin
. As of this writing, virologic response rates have been unsatisfactory whe
n these agents are used as monotherapies. Furthermore, combining alpha inte
rferons with either UDCA or NSAIDs does not appear to improve sustained vir
ologic response rates. However; combination regimens composed of an alpha i
nterferon plus amantadine, or an alpha interferon plus rimantadine, or trip
le therapy with either amantadine or rimantadine plus an alpha interferon a
nd ribavirin, warrant further investigation.