A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression

Citation
Ag. Patwardhan et al., A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression, SPINE, 24(10), 1999, pp. 1003-1009
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1003 - 1009
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(19990515)24:10<1003:AFLITL>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Study Design. An experimental approach was used to test human cadaveric spi ne specimens. Objective. To assess the response of the whole lumbar spine to a compressiv e follower load whose path approximates the tangent to the curve of the lum bar spine. Summary of Background Data. Compression on the lumbar spine is 1000 N for s tanding and walking and is higher during lifting. Ex vivo experiments show it buckles at 80-100 N. Differences between maximum ex vivo and in vivo loa ds have not been satisfactorily explained. Methods. A new experimental technique was developed for applying a compress ive follower load of physiologic magnitudes up to 1200 N, The experimental technique applied loads that minimized the internal shear forces and bendin g moments, made the resultant internal force compressive, and caused the lo ad path to approximate the tangent to the curve of the lumbar spine. Results. A compressive vertical load applied in the neutral lordotic and fo rward-flexed postures caused large changes in lumbar lordosis at small load magnitudes. The specimen approached its extension or flexion limits at a v ertical load of 100 N. In sharp contrast, the lumbar spine supported a load of up to 1200 N without damage or instability when the load path was tange nt to the spinal curve. Conclusions. Until this study, an experimental technique for applying compr essive loads of in vivo magnitudes to the whole lumbar spine was unavailabl e. The load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine sharply increased under a compressive follower load, as long as the load path remained within a smal l range around the centers of rotation of the lumbar segments. The follower load path provides an explanation of how the whole lumbar spine can be lor dotic and yet resist large compressive loads. This study may have implicati ons for determining the role of trunk muscles in stabilizing the lumbar spi ne.