Effect of pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and weed control

Citation
Cd. Monks et al., Effect of pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and weed control, WEED TECH, 13(1), 1999, pp. 6-11
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
WEED TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
0890037X → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
6 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-037X(199901/03)13:1<6:EOPMAD>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at one location in Georgia (1994) and at t wo locations in Alabama (1994 and 1995) to evaluate the effects of MSMA or DSMA plus pyrithiobac applied postemergence (POST) in cotton. Pyrithiobac a t 0.07 kg ai/ ha was applied POST alone or in combination with MSMA at 1.1 kg ai/ha or DSMA at 1.7 kg ai/ha at the pinhead square stage of cotton grow th. Cotton was tolerant to the POST applications of pyrithiobac. Adding MSM A or DSMA to pyrithiobac injured cotton similar to MSMA or DSMA applied alo ne. Plant mapping data indicated that all treatments had no effect on heigh t : node ratio, reproductive or vegetative node production, or square reten tion at the first or second fruiting position. Cotton maturity response to MSMA and DSMA ranged from no effect to delayed maturity. Adding DSMA to pyr ithiobac increased Florida beggarweed and common cocklebur control over pyr ithiobac applied alone in 1995 but did not increase control in 1994. Adding DSMA to pyrithiobac increased sicklepod control over pyrithiobac applied a lone in the three site years it was rated in the Alabama tests. Where sickl epod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and dec rease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone.