Avoidance, mitigation and compensation are three planning concepts designed
to counteract the adverse impacts of infrastructure on nature. To promote
the compensation principle introduced in the Netherlands, this article prop
oses guidelines for its implementation in the context of highway developmen
t. To this end, a coherent framework has been developed comprising: (1) imp
acts on nature, (2) concepts for use in planning ecological compensation, a
nd (3) ecological, spatial-planning and financial instruments for realizing
such compensation. Finally, the Dutch experience is discussed within the i
nternational context. Recommendations are made for improving the implementa
tion of compensation. These stress the importance of creating 'win-win' sit
uations to increase public support, of dealing with impacts that cannot be
predicted, and of developing criteria for evaluating compensation plans. Th
ere are still several priority problems to be dealt with: the effects of ha
bitat isolation caused by highway projects, the effectiveness of compensati
on measures and compensation ratios (viz. ratios of replacement to lost are
a) greater than one, the real costs associated with replacing habitats, the
feasibility of compensation for ecological values that are difficult to re
place, and the strategy to exchange impacted and substitute habitats. (C) 1
999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.