A comparison of bone mineral density and muscle strength in young male adults with different exercise level

Citation
U. Pettersson et al., A comparison of bone mineral density and muscle strength in young male adults with different exercise level, CALCIF TIS, 64(6), 1999, pp. 490-498
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0171967X → ACNP
Volume
64
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
490 - 498
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-967X(199906)64:6<490:ACOBMD>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate any differences in bone mass at di fferent sites between young adults subjected to a high physical activity an d a group of young adults with a low level of physical activity. In additio n, we compared the relationship among bone mass, muscle strength, and body constitution in these two groups. The reference group consisted of 20 men, age 24.6 +/- 2.3 years, not training for more than 3 hours per week. The ic e hockey players consisted of 20 players, age 23.4 +/- 4.9 years, from an i ce hockey team in the second highest national Swedish league, training for about 10 hours per week. The groups were matched according to age, height, and weight. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in total body, he ad, humerus, spine, pelvis, femur, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochante r, femur diaphysis, proximal tibia, and tibia diaphysis using dual energy X -ray absorptiometry. BMD was significantly higher in the total body (8.1%), humerus (11.4%),spine (12.7%), pelvis (12.4%), femoral neck (10.3%), femur (7.4%), proximal tibia (9.8%), and tibia diaphysis (7.5%) in the high acti vity group. Fat mass was significantly lower in the high activity group (18 .7%). The high activity group also had a significantly higher lean body mas s (5.4%) and a significantly higher isokinetic muscle strength of the quadr iceps muscle compared with the reference group. In the reference group, the re was a general strong independent relationship between muscle strength of the thigh and all BMD sites,except for the head, tibia diaphysis, and prox imal tibia. Furthermore, in the same group, body mass index (BMI) independe ntly predicted pelvis BMD. On the contrary, in the high activity group, mus cle strength did not predict any BMD site at all. In the same group, body c onstitutional parameters (weight, height, and fat mass) independently predi cted pelvis BMD, and BMI was shown to be an independent predictor of humeru s BMD. The differences in BMD between the groups seem to be site-specific a nd may be associated with the type and magnitude of loading during off seas on training and preferentially during ice hockey. High physical activity se ems to weaken the relationship between BMD and muscle strength. Hence, impa ct forces may be of greater importance in regulating bone mass than muscle strength in itself in highly trained athletes.