Persistent interracial wage differentials present a challenge for neoclassi
cal models of discrimination, which claim that long-run competition is not
consistent with persistent discrimination. This study provides an empirical
examination of the missing variable and job competition models of interrac
ial wage inequality. The results argue strongly against the missing variabl
es approach and strongly in favour of the job competition model. Specifical
ly, this study finds that about one-half of the male African American-white
and Latino-white interracial wage differentials are due to market discrimi
nation against African Americans and Latinos. In addition, the positive and
significant coefficients on the race-gender employment-density variables s
trongly affirm the job competition model's contention that access to white
(especially) male-dominated jobs increases an individual's wage rate-regard
less of race. Racial job segregation, then, is an important explanatory var
iable for racial wage discrimination.