This study compared the initial and long-term skeletal and dental effe
cts of Herbst and Bass appliance therapy for correction of Class II ma
locclusion. The sample comprised 18 pairs of boys matched for growth p
eriod at the time of therapy, with similar pre-treatment sagittal and
vertical jaw base relationships. One boy in each pair was treated with
the Herbst and the other with the Bass appliance. At follow-up, 15 bo
ys of the Herbst group and 17 of the Bass group were available. Latera
l cephalograms in centric occlusion taken before treatment, after 6 mo
nths of treatment and at the end of growth were analysed. After 6 mont
hs of treatment the Bass appliance seemed to have a greater effect on
mandibular jaw base position. The correction of overjet and sagittal m
olar relationship was more complete in the Herbst patients due to dent
al changes. At follow-up varying effects both between and within pairs
were observed. Overall, the skeletal and dental changes from start of
treatment to end of growth were of the same magnitude. A restraining
effect on the position of the maxilla was observed in both groups, som
ewhat more pronounced in the Bass sample. Both treatment methods are m
ost useful in correction of severe Class II malocclusions. It was, how
ever, difficult to find possible differences in treatment effects betw
een the two methods due to great individual variations of growth.