Does degree of obesity influence the validity of reported energy and protein intake? Results from the SOS Dietary Questionnaire

Citation
Ak. Lindroos et al., Does degree of obesity influence the validity of reported energy and protein intake? Results from the SOS Dietary Questionnaire, EUR J CL N, 53(5), 1999, pp. 375-378
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
ISSN journal
09543007 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
375 - 378
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-3007(199905)53:5<375:DDOOIT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: To test the validity of a dietary questionnaire which was develo ped with the particular goal of measuring dietary intake in obese subjects. Design: Reported energy intake was compared with 24 h energy expenditure me asured in a chamber for indirect calorimetry (24 EE) and reported nitrogen intake with nitrogen in urine collected during the 24 h in the chamber. Sub jects: Twenty-nine overweight men and women, body mass index (BMI) ranging from 25.5-49.5 kg/m(2). Results: Reported energy intake correlated significantly with 24 EE (r = 0. 50, P = 0.006) and reported urinary nitrogen correlated significantly with urinary nitrogen excretion (r = 0.56, P = 0.0015). Mean reported energy int ake +/- s.d. was 10.2 +/- 3.6 MJ and mean 24 EE +/- s.d. was 10.3 +/- 1.9 M J. Although this difference was small and non significant, it indicates som e underreporting if one can assume that these overweight subjects are less physically active in the chamber than in free-living conditions. Reported n itrogen intake also suggested underreporting at the group level. However, w hen the data were analysed at the individual level it was clear that the un derreporting errors did not increase with increasing degree of obesity. Conclusions: Previous studies with the SOS dietary questionnaire have demon strated that it is possible to obtain plausible energy intakes from both ob ese and nonobese subjects. This present analysis further demonstrates that the questionnaire discriminates overweight subjects with high and low intak es of energy and protein, using unbiased biomarkers to judge validity. Thes e data provide additional support for the usefulness of the SOS dietary que stionnaire.