The design and analysis of chemoprevention trials in prostate cancer is mor
e complicated than that of an ordinary treatment efficacy trial. The follow
ing issues must be taken into account when designing prospective randomized
chemoprevention trials: (1) The choice of the primary endpoint: biopsy-pro
ven prostate cancer or mortality from prostate cancer? The choice of the en
dpoint has a major impact on the design of the trial, its overall duration,
and the number of patients required. (2) The sample size calculation which
depends on the event rate in the control group, the size of the difference
to be detected, the size of the type I and type II errors, the non-adheren
ce and crossover rates, and the duration of patient entry and follow-up. (3
) The possible confounding between the intervention and ascertainment of th
e endpoint. What is the effect of the intervention on the sensitivity and s
pecificity of prostate screening tests? What a re its implications on trial
design? (4) The effect of 'noncompliance' on intent-to-treat analyses: non
adherence or treatment refusal, crossovers, loss to follow-up, biopsy refus
al, and intercurrent deaths. (5) The assessment of side effects, both acute
and long term.