Duration of the grain-filling period in maize is not affected by photoperiod and incident PPFD during the vegetative phase

Authors
Citation
M. Tollenaar, Duration of the grain-filling period in maize is not affected by photoperiod and incident PPFD during the vegetative phase, FIELD CR RE, 62(1), 1999, pp. 15-21
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
ISSN journal
03784290 → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
15 - 21
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-4290(199906)62:1<15:DOTGPI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Total number of initiated leaves and duration from sowing to silking increa ses when photoperiod is increased during the photoperiod-sensitive phase in maize (Zea mays L.). Little is known, however, about possible other effect s of photoperiod and incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) on rate of development and duration of life cycle. A study was undertaken to q uantify effects of photoperiod and incident PPFD from sowing to the 15-leaf stage on rate of leaf appearance and duration of the grain-filling period. The short-season maize hybrid Pioneer 3902 was grown in growth cabinets fr om sowing to the 15-leaf stage with either (i) a 10 h photoperiod at high P PFD (650 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)), (ii) a 20 h photoperiod consisting of 10 h of high PPFD followed by 10 h of low PPFD (5-50 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)), or (iii) a 20 h photoperiod of high PPFD. From the 15-leaf stage to maturity the pl ants were placed under a 16 h photoperiod in a growth room. Increasing phot operiod from 10 to 20 h increased final number of initiated leaves and dela yed silking but did not affect rate of leaf appearance. Doubling incident P PFD to a value similar to that under Ontario field conditions during the su mmer resulted in a 16% increase in rate of leaf appearance and in a signifi cant increase in total number of initiated leaves. Differences in final num ber of initiated leaves and in rate of leaf appearance from sowing to the 1 5-leaf stage among treatments resulted in a 4-day difference in silking dat e between the 10 h photoperiod treatment and the two 20 h photoperiod treat ments. Duration of the grain-filling period did not differ among the three treatments. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.