We show that capital charges for foreign currency options estimated using a
standardized model proposed by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervison a
re not consistently related to value at risk (VAR). We propose a simplified
incremental model (SIM) and a simplified value at risk (SVAR) model and co
mpare them to an internal model based on J.P. Morgan's RiskMetrics(TM). We
conclude that it is possible to construct a standardized model that is as e
ffective as an internal model, especially for small portfolios. Since inacc
urate forecasting under internal models is now subject to penalties, some b
anks may prefer standardized models.