Use of immunoaffinity columns for clean-up of diarrhetic toxins (okadaic acid and dinophysistoxins) extracts from shellfish prior to their analysis by HPLC fluorimetry
L. Puech et al., Use of immunoaffinity columns for clean-up of diarrhetic toxins (okadaic acid and dinophysistoxins) extracts from shellfish prior to their analysis by HPLC fluorimetry, FOOD ADDIT, 16(6), 1999, pp. 239-251
Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) is a severe gastro-intestinal disease
caused by consumption of seafood contaminated by microalgal toxins, mainly
okadaic acid (OA) and structurally related toxins, dinophysistoxins (DTXs).
Regulatory monitoring is generally based on rodent bioassays which, howeve
r, present some technical and ethical disadvantages. The most promising tec
hnique of analysis of these toxins involves an HPLC separation with spectro
fluorimetric detection after derivatization of the toxins with a fluorescen
t reagent. The lack of specificity of the extraction procedure (liquid-liqu
id partition), and the presence of interfering compounds in the matrix, doe
s nor allow the determination and the quantification of low amounts of toxi
ns in seafood. In this paper, the authors report the development and the ch
aracterization of immunoaffinity columns (IAC), which were elaborated using
anti-okadaic acid monoclonal antibodies, for a specific retention of the O
A group of toxins. The coupling yield and the stability of these columns we
re investigated as well as their capacity to remove interfering compounds.
Cross-reactivity was observed between the antibodies and the DTX-1 and the
DTX-2, allowing the detection of the different toxins in a single analysis.
Different spiked (1 mu g OA/ g) or naturally-contaminated (mussel digestiv
e gland 2 mu g OA/g, algae. 165 mu g OA/g) matrices were tested. The recove
ry for OA varied from 55 to 95% according to the matrices. The IAC purifica
tion was then included as a step of a global [IAC/HPLC/spectrofluorimetric
detection] method and the performance of the method was evaluated. Estimati
ons of the linearity and the accuracy (percentages of the presumptive respo
nse for OA in the range +101% to + 114%) were satisfactory in accordance wi
th the method validation criteria.