Reflections on three field lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Citation
T. Lerut et al., Reflections on three field lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, HEP-GASTRO, 46(26), 1999, pp. 717-725
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01726390 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
26
Year of publication
1999
Pages
717 - 725
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-6390(199903/04)46:26<717:ROTFLI>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: One of the most controversial questions in the surgical tr eatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) i s the extent of lymph node dissection, in particular the value of the cervi cal lymph node dissection (the so-called third field). METHODOLOGY: This study reflects a single institution's experience with thi s extensive lymphadenectomy, the technique of which is described in detail. RESULTS: Adding the third field to the lymph node dissection markedly impro ved accuracy of staging. Unforeseen involvement of lymph nodes in the neck was found in 30%. In T3N+ tumors of the GEJ, as much as 16.6% of positive l ymph nodes were detected in the neck. Locoregional recurrence without dista nt metastasis was found in 6 patients (17.8%) out of a group of 37 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. All 6 patients had stage TV disease b ecause of distant lymph node metastasis (M+Ly). In 3 of these patients, loc oregional recurrence occurred only after 3 years or more. In a subsequent s eries of 100 esophagectomies performed between 1992 and July 1993 no differ ence in outcome between radical versus standard resection was noticed for e arly stage I and II. However, there is a tendency towards a better estimate d 5-year survival in favor of radical dissections (21%) versus standard res ection (12%) in stage III and IV. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive three field lymphadenectomy can be safely performed without increasing hospital mortality (0%) and morbidity. Improved accuracy of staging, prolonged disease-free survival and potential increased cure r ate are confirmed by our experience. Survival obtained with this technique has to be compared with survival obtained by other, multimodality treatment forms.