This prospective study examines the benefits of using natural cycles instea
d of stimulated cycles in poor responders to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) t
reatment, Eleven patients in whom puncture was cancelled or who failed to c
onceive because of a poor response were included in the analysis. The data
for natural cycles (n = 16) were compared with data obtained during previou
s stimulated cycles (n = 25) in the same women. Out of 16 natural cycles, 1
3 (81.3%) were scheduled for oocyte retrieval compared to 13 out of 25 stim
ulated cycles (52%). Eighteen metaphase II oocytes were obtained during sti
mulated cycles, giving a 66% fertilization rate. In natural cycles, 11 meta
phase II oocytes were available giving a fertilization rate of 78.6%. A mea
n number of 51.5 +/- 25 ampoules of gonadotrophins per cycle were used duri
ng ovarian stimulation. Three clinical pregnancies were obtained after embr
yo transfer in natural cycles (18.8%/started cycle) compared to none in sti
mulated cycles, Our findings demonstrate that an encouraging number of preg
nancies can be achieved by IVF during natural cycles in poor responders to
ovarian stimulation. This may not be the first approach to consider in IVF
but it should be offered as an alternative after two ovarian response failu
res using classical protocols of stimulation.