F. Parazzini et al., Ablation of lesions or no treatment in minimal-mild endometriosis in infertile women: a randomized trial, HUM REPR, 14(5), 1999, pp. 1332-1334
In order to analyse the efficacy of resection/ablation of mininal/mild endo
metriotic lesions for improving fertility, we conducted a randomized clinic
al trial. Eligible patients were women aged less than or equal to 36 years
who were trying to conceive and had a laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis
of minimal/mild endometriosis (stage I or II of the revised American Fertil
ity Society classification) and otherwise unexplained infertility for great
er than or equal to 2 years. Eligible women were randomly assigned to resec
tion Or ablation of visible endometriosis (54 patients) or diagnostic lapar
oscopy only (47 patients). After laparoscopy women tried to conceive sponta
neously for 1 year (follow-up period). A total of five women withdrew from
the study: three for personal reasons, and two were lost to follow-up. Cons
idering 51 women in the resection/ablation and 45 in the no-treatment group
who ended the follow-up period, 12 (24%) in the resection/ablation group a
nd 13 (29%) in the no treatment group conceived; the difference was not sig
nificant. Two spontaneous abortions were observed in the resection/ablation
group and three in the no-treatment one. Thus the 1 year birth rate was 10
out of 51 women (19.6%) in the resection/ablation group and 10 out of 45 w
omen (22.2%) in the no-treatment group. In conclusion, the results of this
study do not support the hypothesis that ablation of endometriotic lesions
markedly improves fertility rates.